The Role of the Government on Tobacco Use Essay Example for Free

The Role of the Government on Tobacco Use EssayThe article, If Its dandy For Philip Morris, Can It Also Be Good for Public Health?, which was written by assembly line columnist Joe Nocera and published in the New York Times, basically explores the realities concerning the government, particularly the Food and Drug Administration, and the regulation of baccy plant use.According to the article, although tobacco plant company executives themselves, notably Steve Parrish, senior vice-president of Philip Morris have openly supported the regulation of tobacco use, it appears that the move lacks a concerted effort from the government. Moreover, it is also apparent that tobacco executives like Parrish have their person-to-person business agendas in advocating tobacco regulation.In general, it is safe to assume that the public is more than aware nigh the dangers and health risks associated with tobacco smoking such as lung cancer, emphysema, and various heart diseases, among new( prenominal)s. However, it is interesting to note that despite the various campaigns against tobacco smoking and other educational advertisements about it, there are let off millions of citizenry around the world who smoke. In fact, based on the article, in 2005, Philip Morris USA alone hauled in $4.6 one thousand thousand in profits.In this regard, it is quite obvious that the governments main role is to somehow form tobacco use so that smokers will not suffer its deadly effects. However, this is easier said that done. According to the article, go there have been several initiatives to regulate tobacco use in the past, such as the negative on all cigarette advertisements, it seems to fall short when it comes to the actual implementation.The first plausible reason hobo this is that the regulation would mean decrease in profits for tobacco companies, which in turn, would affect tobacco manufacturing plant workers. And considering the global financial crisis, loss of jobs is no t a logical option even though its for the benefit of the publics health.In short, while the governments duty in tobacco use is clear, it is virtually powerless to make any strong moves that would fulfill their role. The tobacco executives, on the other hand, may show that they support tobacco regulation, but their true motives are unclear. After all, they are still businessmen and it would not be surprising if their actions are simply meant to earn additional profits.ReferencesNocera, J. (2006). If Its Good For Philip Morris, Can It Also Be Good for Public Health? The New York Times. Retrieved April 17, 2009 from http//www.nytimes.com/2006/06/18/magazine/18tobacco.html?pagewanted=3_r=1.